PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FM.TO vs. ^TNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FM.TO^TNX
YTD Return65.35%15.13%
1Y Return15.89%0.23%
3Y Return (Ann)-13.92%41.37%
5Y Return (Ann)8.71%19.49%
10Y Return (Ann)0.54%6.75%
Sharpe Ratio0.25-0.17
Sortino Ratio0.82-0.08
Omega Ratio1.090.99
Calmar Ratio0.19-0.07
Martin Ratio0.86-0.35
Ulcer Index17.01%11.31%
Daily Std Dev58.79%23.47%
Max Drawdown-90.98%-93.78%
Current Drawdown-59.60%-44.52%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between FM.TO and ^TNX is 0.15, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 65.35% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 15.13% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has underperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 0.54%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.75% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.41%
1.69%
FM.TO
^TNX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.92
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.11
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.24
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.42
^TNX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.03, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.21
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.02, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.02
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.01, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.01
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.06, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.06

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FM.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.25, which is higher than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FM.TO and ^TNX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.32
0.03
FM.TO
^TNX

Drawdowns

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and ^TNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-63.96%
-36.84%
FM.TO
^TNX

Volatility

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 15.87% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 6.35%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.87%
6.35%
FM.TO
^TNX