PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FM.TO vs. ^TNX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


FM.TO^TNX
YTD Return71.43%12.67%
1Y Return-42.25%22.74%
3Y Return (Ann)-14.03%38.75%
5Y Return (Ann)9.75%12.77%
10Y Return (Ann)-1.70%5.65%
Sharpe Ratio-0.670.96
Daily Std Dev65.03%25.17%
Max Drawdown-90.98%-93.78%
Current Drawdown-58.22%-45.71%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.2

The correlation between FM.TO and ^TNX is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, FM.TO achieves a 71.43% return, which is significantly higher than ^TNX's 12.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FM.TO has underperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of -1.70%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.65% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%2,000.00%4,000.00%6,000.00%8,000.00%10,000.00%12,000.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
10,776.16%
-27.13%
FM.TO
^TNX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


First Quantum Minerals Ltd.

Treasury Yield 10 Years

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FM.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.63
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at -0.63, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.63
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.92
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at -0.52, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.52
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for FM.TO, currently valued at -0.84, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.00-0.84
^TNX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.68
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.15, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.15
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 0.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.35
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ^TNX, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.001.53

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FM.TO Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the ^TNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of FM.TO and ^TNX.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.50December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.63
0.68
FM.TO
^TNX

Drawdowns

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FM.TO drawdown since its inception was -90.98%, roughly equal to the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -93.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FM.TO and ^TNX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-61.65%
-38.19%
FM.TO
^TNX

Volatility

FM.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison

First Quantum Minerals Ltd. (FM.TO) has a higher volatility of 21.69% compared to Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) at 5.12%. This indicates that FM.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%December2024FebruaryMarchAprilMay
21.69%
5.12%
FM.TO
^TNX